Original Articles

• The use and limits of various methods of sampling and interpretation of benthic macro-invertebrates

  Antony DAVIES

  1-6

  https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2001.s1.1

  2099

  PDF: 4730

  • PDF

• Development of a concept for integrated ecological river assessment in Flanders, Belgium

  Peter GOETHALS, Niels DE PAUW

  7-16

  https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2001.s1.7

  2097

  PDF: 1114

  • PDF

• A conceptual approach to the biomonitoring of freshwater: the Ecological Ambience System

  Michel LAFONT

  17-24

  https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2001.s1.17

  2837

  PDF: 1105

  • PDF

• Ecological quality assessment of rivers and integrated catchment management in England and Wales

  Paul LOGAN

  25-32

  https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2001.s1.25

  2350

  PDF: 903

  • PDF

• Is what has been measured of any direct relevance to the success of the macrophyte in its particular environment?

  Georg A. JANAUER

  33-38

  https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2001.s1.33

  2174

  PDF: 798

  • PDF

• A Europe-wide system for assessing the quality of rivers using macroinvertebrates: the AQEM Project*) and its importance for southern Europe (with special emphasis on Italy)

  Andrea BUFFAGNI, Joanna L. KEMP, Stefania ERBA, Carlo BELFIORE, Daniel HERING, Otto MOOG

  39-48

  https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2001.s1.39

  2685

  PDF: 1517

  • PDF

• Biological monitoring of aquatic ecosystems in Italy

  Renato BAUDO

  49-52

  https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2001.s1.49

  2221

  PDF: 655

  • PDF

• The use of aquatic moss (Fontinalis antipyretica) as monitor of contamination in standing and running waters: limits and advantages

  Roberto M. CENCI

  53-61

  https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2001.s1.53

  3338

• Monitoring of the aquatic environment by species accumulator of pollutants: a review

  Oscar RAVERA

  63-78

  https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2001.s1.63

  3805

  PDF: 1705

  • PDF