Methane formation and consumption by sediments in a cross-channel profile of a small river impoundment
Methane dynamics in aquatic sediments

Accepted: 23 April 2019
HTML: 27
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Rivers are a natural source of methane (CH4) into the atmosphere and may contribute significantly to total CH4 emissions. Even though the details of sources of CH4 in rivers are not fully understood, weirs have been recognized as a hotspot of CH4 emissions. In this study, we investigated CH4 production and consumption in air-exposed river sediments along a cross-channel transect located upstream of a weir. Stable carbon isotopes were used for determination of individual methanogenic pathways. In order to understand the relationship between physicochemical and biological processes, additional parameters such as organic matter, grain median size, and carbon and nitrogen content were characterized as well. Generally, samples from the surface sediment layer (0-10 cm) had higher CH4 production than sediments from the deeper layer (10-20 cm) during the incubation experiments. Sediments near the bank zones and in the mid-channel were characterized by the highest organic carbon content (6.9 %) as well the highest methanogenic activity (2.5 mmol g-1 DW d-1). The CH4 production was predominated by H2/CO2 dependent methanogenesis in the surface sediment layer (0-10 cm), while the proportion of acetoclastic and hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis in the deeper sediment layer (10-20 cm) was balanced. The CH4 oxidation potential of sediments showed the same spatial pattern as observed for the CH4 production. Our results showed high spatial variability of sediment CH4 production and oxidation in the cross-channel profile upstream of the weir, whereas the highest CH4 dynamics were observed in the littoral zones. This variability was closely linked with the carbon and nitrogen content in the sediment samples.
Edited by
Franco Tassi, University of Florence, ItalySupporting Agencies
This study was financially supported by Palacký University grant IGA_PrF_2017_015How to Cite
-
Jiří Dušek, Anna Faußer, Stanislav Stellner, Marian KazdaScience of The Total Environment : 2023
-
Kristian M. Smits, Daniel S. Grant, Sara Ellen Johnston, Matthew J. Bogard, Stewart B. Rood, L. Brent Selinger, Lawrence B. FlanaganJournal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences : 2022
-
Jiajia Wang, Yan-Ni Qu, Paul N. Evans, Qinghai Guo, Fengwu Zhou, Ming Nie, Qusheng Jin, Yan Zhang, Xiangmei Zhai, Ming Zhou, Zhiguo Yu, Qing-Long Fu, Yuan-Guo Xie, Brian P. Hedlund, Wen-Jun Li, Zheng-Shuang Hua, Zimeng Wang, Yanxin WangScience Advances : 2023
-
Diego G. Panique-Casso, Peter Goethals, Long HoWater Research : 2024
-
Martin Rulík, Lukáš Weber, Saw Min, Radovan ŠmídFrontiers in Environmental Science : 2023
-
A. Bednařík, P. Bodmer, E. Darenova, L. Kokrda, M. PavelkaJournal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences : 2024
-
Latika Patel, Rashmi Singh, Sarath C. Gowd, Shoji D. ThottathilWater Research : 2024
-
Jian Wang, Baonan He, Jiangtao He, Zhanxue Sun, Jinhui Liu, Haiyan Liu, Yadan Guo, Zhongkui Zhou, Xuegang WangEnvironmental Research : 2025