Phytoplankton responses to an extreme drought season: A case study at two reservoirs from a semiarid region, Northeastern Brazil
Phytoplankton during extreme drought season

Accepted: 7 February 2019
HTML: 37
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
The temporal phytoplankton biomass variation at two Neotropical reservoirs during an extreme drought season were analyzed. Here we sought to evaluate the main abiotic factors involved in dynamics of phytoplankton during this drought period. The main difference between the reservoirs was the intensive fish and shrimp farming in one of the reservoirs. For quantitative analysis, sampling with bottles were carried out at an average depth of 0.5m. Water temperature, pH and electrical conductivity parameters were measured in situ and water samples were collected for dissolved inorganic nitrogen and soluble reactive phosphorus analyses. Aquaculture was probably one among the causes for the reservoirs were so different in the physical and chemical variables, as shown by the principal components analysis. The results showed specific groups dominance in both reservoirs. In the Cachoeira II reservoir, an invasive dinoflagellate, Ceratium furcoides, was present in all analyzed months, while, in the Saco I reservoir, cyanobacteria group represented more than 50% of phytoplankton biomass, mainly Microcystis aeruginosa and Dolichospermum sp. In two reservoirs precipitation, soluble reactive phosphorus and electrical conductivity were positively related with phytoplankton. Phytoplankton biomass was considerably larger in the Cachoeira II reservoir, due to the greater size and biovolume of the dominant dinoflagellate. These findings suggest that species dominance in extreme drought events may be favored.
Edited by
Diego Copetti, CNR-IRSA Brugherio, ItalySupporting Agencies
Programa de Educação Tutorial (MEC/SESu), Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)How to Cite
-
Lilyana Carbonell Sorí, Julio Pedraza Garciga, Néstor Armando Carbonell Rivero, Edelbis López DávilaWaste and Biomass Valorization : 2025
-
Fanhua Meng, Zhenxiang Li, Lei Li, Feng Lu, Yan Liu, Xinxin Lu, Yawen FanScientific Reports : 2020
-
Xinyu Sun, Margaret Armstrong, Amirmohammad Moradi, Ruchi Bhattacharya, Ana M. Antão-Geraldes, Elias Munthali, Hans-Peter Grossart, Shin-ichiro S. Matsuzaki, Külli Kangur, Julita A. Dunalska, Jason D. Stockwell, Lisa BorreAmbio : 2025
-
Yue Wu, Qi Ye, Siwen Chen, Kaining Chen, Shuzhan Ma, Yiheng Chang, Xiaoli ShiJournal of Oceanology and Limnology : 2024
-
Carlos Yure Barbosa de Oliveira, Thayna Lye Viegas, Rafael Garcia Lopes, Herculano Cella, Rafael Silva Menezes, Aline Terra Soares, Nelson Roberto Antoniosi Filho, Roberto Bianchini DernerBiomass and Bioenergy : 2020
-
Carlos Yure B. Oliveira, Ayanne Jamyres Gomes da Silva Almeida, Cicero Diogo Lins de Oliveira, Alfredo Olivera Galvez, Danielli Matias de Macedo DantasRodriguésia : 2021
-
Xinyu Sun, Kendra S. Cheruvelil, Patrick J. Hanly, Patricia A. SorannoLimnology and Oceanography : 2025
-
Betsy Dantas de Medeiros, Magnólia de Araújo Campos, José Etham de Lucena Barbosa, Gislayne Kerliny de Aquino Queiroz, Maria João Feio, Daniele Jovem-Azevêdo, Gerry ClossMarine and Freshwater Research : 2025