First record of males of Cypridopsis vidua (Crustacea, Ostracoda) species complex for Europe

Submitted: 7 March 2024
Accepted: 29 March 2024
Published: 29 April 2024
Abstract Views: 135
PDF: 91
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Until recently, only asexually reproducing populations were known in Cypridopsis vidua, a species complex with one of the widest geographical distributions among non-marine ostracods. The discovery of males, most likely functional, from the United States and China has called into question its obligate parthenogen status. Here we report the first report of males for Europe, found in a small artificial pond in northern Italy. It seems plausible that sexual populations are much more widespread than hitherto known, as the recognition of males requires the dissection of individuals. Compared with the available descriptions of males belonging to Cypridopsis vidua and related species, that of the male illustrated here show morphological differences in the antennulae and prehensile palps, which in the Cypridoidea are sexually dimorphic and often diagnostic to distinguish between related species. Adult males show significantly smaller valve sizes than adult females, while adult females in which sperm were found inside the carapace have more variable lengths than those without sperm. No differences in valve coloration or dark banding pattern were found between males and females, and differences in valve outline were mostly negligible. The limitations of an exclusively morphological approach in the case of similar morphospecies are highlighted, as well as the importance of adopting objective criteria to measure the limits of morphological variability allowing the identification of separate taxonomic entities.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Baltanás A, Danielopol DL, 2013. Body-size distribution and biogeographical patterns in non-marine ostracods (Crustacea: Ostracoda). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 109:409-423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12041
Bode SNS, Adolfsson S, Lamatsch DK, Martins MJF, Schmit O, Vandekerkhove J, et al., 2010. Exceptional cryptic diversity and multiple origins of parthenogenesis in a freshwater ostracod. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 54:542-552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2009.08.022
Butlin R, Schön I, Martens K, 1998. Asexual reproduction in nonmarine ostracods. Heredity 81:473-480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6884540
Chaplin JA, 1993. The local displacement of a sexually reproducing ostracod by a conspecific parthenogen. Heredity 71:259-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1993.134
Fuhrmann R, Schirrmeister L, Pietrzeniuk E, 1997. [Ostrakoden und Mollusken aus den weichselspätglazialen Sedimenten des Biesenthaler Beckens (N-Brandenburg, Barnim)].[Article in German]. Z. Geol. Wissenschaft 25:489-512.
Furtos NC, 1936. Fresh-water Ostracoda from Florida and North Carolina. Am. Midl. Nat. 17:491-522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2419975
Gomes N, de Araújo Costa D, Martins D, Rocha S, Sousa-Pinto I, Antunes C, 2023. Insights into the fauna associated with Egeria densa at the upper section of the international Minho River estuary (NW Iberian Peninsula) 3 decades after its establishment. J. Coast. Conserv. 27:36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-023-00962-y
Griffiths HI, 1995. European Quaternary freshwater Ostracoda: a biostratigraphic and palaeobiogeographic primer. Scopolia 34:1-168.
Havel JE, Hebert PD, 1989. Apomictic parthenogenesis and genotypic diversity in Cypridopsis vidua (Ostracoda: Cyprididae). Heredity 62:383-392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1989.53
Horne DJ, Danielopol DL, Martens K, 1998. Reproductive behaviour, p. 157-196. K. Martens (ed.) Sex and parthenogenesis: evolutionary ecology of reproductive modes in non-marine ostracods. Backhuys Publ., Leiden.
Horne DJ, Martens K, 1999. Geographical parthenogenesis in European non-marine ostracods: post-glacial invasion or Holocene stability? Hydrobiologia 391:1-7.
Hunt G, Park LE, LaBarbera M, 2007. A novel crustacean swimming stroke: coordinated four-paddled locomotion in the cypridoidean ostracode Cypridopsis vidua (Müller). Biol. Bull. 212:67-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/25066581
Karanovic I, 2012. Recent freshwater ostracods of the world: Crustacea, Ostracoda, Podocopida. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg: 608 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21810-1
Karanovic I, 2015. Barcoding of ancient lake ostracods (Crustacea) reveals cryptic speciation with extremely low distances. PLoS One 10:e0121133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121133
Karanovic I, 2019. Two new Pontocyprididae (Ostracoda) species from Korea. J. Nat. Hist. 53:2801-2815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2020.1752404
Karanovic I, Sidorov DA, Marmonier P, 2015. Zoogeography of the ostracod genus Nannocandona (Podocopa) with description of two new species from Europe and East Asia. Annal. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim. 51:297-313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2015028
Kesling RV, 1951. The morphology ostracod molt stages. Illinois Biol. Monog. 21:1-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.50392
Koenders A, Schön I, Halse S, Martens K, 2017. Valve shape is not linked to genetic species in the Eucypris virens (Ostracoda, Crustacea) species complex. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 180:36-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12488
Linhart J, Brauneis W, Neubauer W, 2007. Morphomatica (Version 1.6.0.1). University of Graz. Available from: http://palstrat.uni-graz.at/methods in ostracodology.htm
Martens K, 1991. Description of the male of Sclerocypris tuberculata (Methuen, 1910) (Crustacea, Ostracoda, Megalocypridinae). Hydrobiologia 218:127-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00006785
Martens K, Meisch C, 1985. Description of the male of Potamocypris villosa (Jurine, 1820) (Crustacea, Ostracoda). Hydrobiologia 127:9-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00004658
Martens K, Rossetti G, Horne DJ, 2003. How ancient are ancient asexuals? P. Roy. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 270:723-729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2270
Martens K, Savatenalinton S, 2011. A subjective checklist of the recent, free-living, non-marine Ostracoda (Crustacea). Zootaxa 2855:1-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2855.1.1
Martens K, Shribak M, Arkhipova I, Schön I, 2023 The common morphospecies Cypridopsis vidua (O.F. Müller, 1776) (Crustacea, Ostracoda) is not an obligate parthenogen. Belg. J. Zool. 153:15-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26496/bjz.2023.107
Martins MJF, 2019. Adult sex-ratio in ostracods and its implications for sexual selection. Invertebr. Reprod. Dev. 63:178-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07924259.2019.1592789
Mbahinzireki G, Uiblein F, Winkler H, 1991. Microhabitat selection of ostracods in relation to predation and food. Hydrobiologia 222:115-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00006099
Meisch C, 2000. [Freshwater Ostracoda of Western and Central Europe]. In: J. Schwoerbel and P. Zwick (eds.), [Süßwasserfauna von Mitteleuropa 8/3].[Book in German]. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg, Berlin: 522 pp.
Meisch C, Smith RJ, Martens K, 2019. A subjective global checklist of the extant non-marine Ostracoda (Crustacea). Eur. J. Taxon. 492:1-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2019.492
Müller OF, 1776. [ Zoologiae Danicae prodromus, seu Animalium Daniae et Norvegiae indigenarum: characteres, nomina, et synonyma imprimis popularium].[Book in Latin]. Typis Hallagerii, Havni, Copenhagen: 282 pp.
Namiotko T, Marmonier P, Danielopol DL, Horne DJ, Artheau M, 2005. New records of rare males of Cryptocandona vavrai Kaufmann, 1900 (Crustacea, Ostracoda), with further additions to the description of the species. Annal. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim. 41:203-219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/limn:20054130203
Nuttall PM, Fernando CH, 1970. Notes on aggregation observed in two species of freshwater Ostracoda. Can. J. Zool. 48:392-393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/z70-063
Roca JR, Baltanás A, Uiblein F, 1993. Adaptive responses in Cypridopsis vidua (Crustacea: Ostracoda) to food and shelter offered by a macrophyte (Chara fragilis). Hydrobiologia 262:127-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00007513
Roca JR, Danielopol DL, 1991. Exploration of interstitial habitats by the phytophilous ostracod Cypridopsis vidua (O.F. Müller): experimental evidence. Annal. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim. 27:243-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/1991018
Rodriguez-Lazaro J, Ruiz-Muñoz F, 2012. A general introduction to ostracods: morphology, distribution, fossil record and applications. Dev. Quat. Sci. 17:1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53636-5.00001-9
Rohlf FJ, 2009. TpsDig, digitize landmarks and outlines. Version 2.14. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, New York.
Rossi V, Gandolfi A, Baraldi F, Bellavere C, Menozzi P, 2007. Phylogenetic relationships of coexisting Heterocypris (Crustacea, Ostracoda) lineages with different reproductive modes from Lampedusa Island (Italy). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 44:1273-1283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2007.04.013
Sari N, Külköylüoğlu O, Akdemir D, 2012. First record and detailed description of the male of Ilyocypris inermis Kaufmann, 1900 (Crustacea, Ostracoda). Turk. J. Zool. 36:484-495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-1012-78
Scharf B, Meisch C, Külköylüoğlu O, Yavuzatmaca M, 2020. Stenocypria fischeri (Lilljeborg, 1883), a poorly known freshwater ostracod (Crustacea, Ostracoda). Bull. Soc. Natural. Lux. 122:217-238.
Schmit O, Adolfsson S, Vandekerkhove J, Rueda J, Bode SNS, Rossetti G, et al., 2013. The distribution of sexual reproduction of the geographic parthenogen Eucypris virens (Crustacea: Ostracoda) matches environmental gradients in a temporary lake. Can. J. Zool. 91:660-671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2012-0236
Schmit O, Fukova I, Vandekerkhove J, Michalakis Y, Matzke-Karasz R, Rossetti G, et al., 2013. Mate recognition as a reproductive barrier in sexual and parthenogenetic Eucypris virens (Crustacea, Ostracoda). Anim. Behav. 85:977-985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.02.021
Schön I, Van Doninck K, Butlin RK, 2003. Evolution in the slow lane: molecular rates of evolution in sexual and asexual ostracods (Crustacea: Ostracoda). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 79:93-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00186.x
Schön I, Rossetti G, Martens K, 2009. Darwinulid ostracods: Ancient asexual scandals or scandalous gossip? p. 217-240. In: I. Schön, K. Martens and P. van Dijk (eds.), Lost sex: the evolutionary biology of parthenogenesis. Springer, Dordrecht. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2770-2_11
Schön I, Pinto RL, Halse S, Smith AJ, Martens K, Birky Jr CW, 2012. Cryptic species in putative ancient asexual darwinulids (Crustacea, Ostracoda). PLoS One 7:e39844. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039844
Schön I, Poux C, Verheyen E, Martens K, 2014. High cryptic diversity and persistent lineage segregation in endemic Romecytheridea (Crustacea, Ostracoda) from the ancient Lake Tanganyika (East Africa). Hydrobiologia 739:119-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-013-1581-y
Schön I, Pieri V, Sherbakov DY, Martens K, 2017. Cryptic diversity and speciation in endemic Cytherissa (Ostracoda, Crustacea) from Lake Baikal. Hydrobiologia 800:61-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-017-3259-3
Smith RJ, Kamiya T, Horne DJ, 2006. Living males of the ‘ancient asexual’ Darwinulidae (Ostracoda: Crustacea). P. Roy. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 273:1569-1578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3452
Spandl H, 1925. Die Tierwelt vorübergehender Gewässer Mitteleuropas. Arch. Hydrobiol. 16:74-132.
Struck TH, Feder JL, Bendiksby M, Birkeland S, Cerca J, Gusarov VI, et al., 2018. Finding evolutionary processes hidden in cryptic species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33:153-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.11.007
Uiblein F, Roca JR, Baltanás A, Danielopol DL, 1996. Tradeoff between foraging and antipredator behaviour in a macrophyte dwelling ostracod. Arch. Hydrobiol. 137:119-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1127/archiv-hydrobiol/137/1996/119
Uiblein F, Roca JR, Danielopol DL, 1994. Experimental observations on the behaviour of the ostracode Cypridopsis vidua. Verh. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol. 25:2418-2420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03680770.1992.11900659
Weismann A, 1880. Parthenogenese bei den Ostracoden. Zool. Anz. 3:82-84.
Zhai D, Fan J, Wang M, 2023. Ostracods from the Kunming area of SW China, with description of two new species and male records of Cypridopsis vidua (O.F. Müller, 1776). Zootaxa 5323:183-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5323.2.2

Edited by

Diego Fontaneto, National Research Council, Water Research Institute (CNR-IRSA), Verbania Pallanza, Italy

How to Cite

Rossetti, Giampaolo, Elena Bellavere, and Ilaria Mazzini. 2024. “First Record of Males of <i>Cypridopsis vidua</I> (Crustacea, Ostracoda) Species Complex for Europe”. Journal of Limnology 83 (1). https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2024.2184.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.