Assessing sediment contamination using six toxicity assays

Abstract

An evaluation of sediment toxicity at Lake Orta, Italy was conducted to compare a toxicity test battery of 6 assays and to evaluate the extent of sediment contamination at various sediment depths. Lake Orta received excessive loadings of copper and ammonia during the 1900’s until a large remediation effort was conducted in 1989-90 using lime addition. Since that time, the lake has shown signs of a steady recovery of biological communities. The study results showed acute toxicity still exists in sediments at a depth of 5 cm and greater. Assays that detected the highest levels of toxicity were two whole sediment exposures (7 d) using Hyalella azteca and Ceriodaphnia dubia. The MicrotoxR assay using pore water was the third most sensitive assay. The Thamnotox, Rototox, Microtox solid phase, and Seed Germination-Root Elongation (pore and solid phase) assays showed occasional to no toxicity. Based on similarity of responses and assay sensitivity, the two most useful assays were the C. dubia (or H. azteca) and Microtox pore water. These assays were effective at describing sediment toxicity in a weight-of-evidence approach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2001-08-01
Section
Original Articles
Keywords:
bioassays, pore water, interstitial water
Statistics
Abstract views: 2307

PDF: 1082
Share it

PlumX Metrics

PlumX Metrics provide insights into the ways people interact with individual pieces of research output (articles, conference proceedings, book chapters, and many more) in the online environment. Examples include, when research is mentioned in the news or is tweeted about. Collectively known as PlumX Metrics, these metrics are divided into five categories to help make sense of the huge amounts of data involved and to enable analysis by comparing like with like.

How to Cite
1.
BURTON Jr. A, BAUDO R, BELTRAMI M, ROWLAND C. Assessing sediment contamination using six toxicity assays. jlimnol [Internet]. 1Aug.2001 [cited 29Mar.2020];60(2):263-7. Available from: https://www.jlimnol.it/index.php/jlimnol/article/view/jlimnol.2001.1.263