Mercury methylation in oxic aquatic macro-environments: a review

Submitted: 26 January 2021
Accepted: 27 February 2021
Published: 9 March 2021
Abstract Views: 1915
PDF: 644
HTML: 87
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.


Mercury methylation in aquatic environments is a key process that incorporates this neurotoxin into the food chain and ultimately the human diet. Mercury methylation is considered to be essentially biotic and mainly driven by sulfate-reducing bacteria present in the bottom sediments in aquatic systems. However, in recent decades, many researchers have shown that this methylation also occurs in oxic layers in conjunction with a high content of particulate organic matter and localized depletion of dissolved oxygen. The goals of this review are to summarize our current understanding of Hg methylation in water columns of both marine and freshwater environments, as well as to highlight knowledge gaps and future research needs. Most of the literature showed that suspended particles (known as marine and lake snow) could be the microenvironment in which Hg methylation could occur across oxic water columns, because they have been recognized as a site of organic matter mineralization and as presenting oxygen gradients around and inside them. To date, the majority of these studies concern marine environments, highlighting the need for more studies in freshwater environments, particularly lacustrine systems. Investigating this new methylmercury production environment is essential for a better understanding of methylmercury incorporation into the trophic chain. In this review, we also propose a model which attempts to highlight the relative importance of a MeHg epilimnetic path over a MeHg benthic-hypolimnetic path, especially in deep lakes. We believe that this model could help to better focus future scientific efforts in limnic environments regarding the MeHg cycle.



PlumX Metrics


Download data is not yet available.


Alldredge AL, Cohen Y, 1987. Can Microscale Chemical Patches Persist in the Sea? Microelectrode Study of Marine Snow, Fecal Pellets. Science 235:689-691. DOI:
Amap/Unep. 2013. Technical Background Report for the Global Mercury Assessment 2013. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, Oslo, Norway/UNEP Chemicals Branch, Geneva, Switzerland. vi + 263 pp.
Amap/Unep. 2015. Global Mercury Modelling: Update of Modelling Results in the Global Mercury Assessment 2013. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, Oslo, Norway/UNEP Chemicals Branch, Geneva, Switzerland. iv + 32 pp.
Benoit JM, Gilmour CC, Heyes A, Mason RP, Miller CL. 2003. Geochemical and biological controls over Methylmercury production and degradation in aquatic ecosystems, p., Biogeochemistry of Environmentally Important Trace Elements. DOI:
Bianchi D, Weber TS, Kiko R, Deutsch C, 2018. Global niche of marine anaerobic metabolisms expanded by particle microenvironments. Nature Geoscience 11:263-268. DOI:
Blais JM, Kalff J, 1995. The influence of lake morphometry on sediment focusing. Limnology and Oceanography 40:582-588. DOI:
Blum JD, Popp BN, Drazen JC, Anela Choy C, Johnson MW, 2013. Methylmercury production below the mixed layer in the North Pacific Ocean. Nature Geoscience 6:879-884. DOI:
Bowman KL, Collins RE, Agather AM, Lamborg CH, Hammerschmidt CR, Kaul D, Dupont CL, Christensen GA, Elias DA, 2019. Distribution of mercury‐cycling genes in the Arctic and equatorial Pacific Oceans and their relationship to mercury speciation. Limnology and Oceanography:lno.11310. DOI:
Bowman KL, Hammerschmidt CR, Lamborg CH, Swarr G, 2015. Mercury in the North Atlantic Ocean: The U.S. GEOTRACES zonal and meridional sections. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography 116:251-261. DOI:
Bowman KL, Hammerschmidt CR, Lamborg CH, Swarr GJ, Agather AM, 2016. Distribution of mercury species across a zonal section of the eastern tropical South Pacific Ocean (U.S. GEOTRACES GP16). Marine Chemistry 186:156-166. DOI:
Bravo AG, Cosio C, 2019. Biotic formation of methylmercury: A bio–physico–chemical conundrum. Limnology and Oceanography:lno.11366. DOI:
Bravo AG, Zopfi J, Buck M, Xu J, Bertilsson S, Schaefer JK, Poté J, Cosio C, 2018. Geobacteraceae are important members of mercury-methylating microbial communities of sediments impacted by waste water releases. The ISME Journal 12:802-812. DOI:
Chiang G, Kidd KA, Díaz-Jaramillo M, Espejo W, Bahamonde P, O’driscoll NJ, Munkittrick KR, 2021. Methylmercury biomagnification in coastal aquatic food webs from western Patagonia and western Antarctic Peninsula. Chemosphere 262. DOI:
Christensen GA, Gionfriddo CM, King AJ, Moberly JG, Miller CL, Somenahally AC, Callister SJ, Brewer H, Podar M, Brown SD, Palumbo AV, Brandt CC, Wymore AM, Brooks SC, Hwang C, Fields MW, Wall JD, Gilmour CC, Elias DA, 2019. Determining the Reliability of Measuring Mercury Cycling Gene Abundance with Correlations with Mercury and Methylmercury Concentrations. Environmental Science & Technology 53:8649-8663. DOI:
Compeau GC, Bartha R, 1985. Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria: Principal Methylators of Mercury in Anoxic Estuarine Sedimentt. APPL. ENVIRON. MICROBIOL. 50:498-501. DOI:
Correia RRS, Guimarães JRD, 2017. Mercury methylation and sulfate reduction rates in mangrove sediments, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: The role of different microorganism consortia. Chemosphere 167:438-443. DOI:
Cossa D, Averty B, Pirrone N, 2009. The origin of methylmercury in open Mediterranean waters. Limnology and Oceanography 54:837-844. DOI:
Cossa D, Durrieu De Madron X, Schäfer J, Lanceleur L, Guédron S, Buscail R, Thomas B, Castelle S, Naudin J-J, 2017. The open sea as the main source of methylmercury in the water column of the Gulf of Lions (Northwestern Mediterranean margin). Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 199:222-237. DOI:
Cossa D, Heimbürger L-E, Lannuzel D, Rintoul SR, Butler ECV, Bowie AR, Averty B, Watson RJ, Remenyi T, 2011. Mercury in the Southern Ocean. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 75:4037-4052. DOI:
Cossa D, Heimbürger L-E, Pérez FF, García-Ibáñez MI, Sonke JE, Planquette H, Lherminier P, Boutorh J, Cheize M, Menzel Barraqueta JL, Shelley R, Sarthou G, 2018. Mercury distribution and transport in the North Atlantic Ocean along the GEOTRACES-GA01 transect. Biogeosciences 15:2309-2323. DOI:
Costa M, Liss PS, 1999. Photoreduction of mercury in sea water and its possible implications for Hg0 air–sea fluxes. Marine Chemistry 68:87-95. DOI:
Du H, Ma M, Igarashi Y, Wang D, 2019. Biotic and Abiotic Degradation of Methylmercury in Aquatic Ecosystems: A Review. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 102:605-611. DOI:
Eckley CS, Hintelmann H, 2006. Determination of mercury methylation potentials in the water column of lakes across Canada. Science of The Total Environment 368:111-125. DOI:
Fao. 2018. Meeting the sustainable development goals.
Fitzgerald WF, Lamborg CH, 2014. Geochemistry of Mercury in the Environment, In: Treatise on Geochemistry (Second Edition): Oxford, Elsevier,.91-129. DOI:
Fleming EJ, Mack EE, Green PG, Nelson DC, 2006. Mercury Methylation from Unexpected Sources: Molybdate-Inhibited Freshwater Sediments and an Iron-Reducing Bacterium. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 72:457-464. DOI:
Gardner WD, Southard JB, Hollister CD, 1985. Sedimentation, resuspension and chemistry of particles in the northwest Atlantic. Marine Geology 65:199-242. DOI:
Gascón Díez E, Loizeau J-L, Cosio C, Bouchet S, Adatte T, Amouroux D, Bravo AG, 2016. Role of Settling Particles on Mercury Methylation in the Oxic Water Column of Freshwater Systems. Environmental Science & Technology 50:11672-11679. DOI:
Gilmour CC, Podar M, Bullock AL, Graham AM, Brown SD, Somenahally AC, Johs A, Hurt RA, Bailey KL, Elias DA, 2013. Mercury Methylation by Novel Microorganisms from New Environments. Environmental Science & Technology 47:11810-11820. DOI:
Gionfriddo CM, Tate MT, Wick RR, Schultz MB, Zemla A, Thelen MP, Schofield R, Krabbenhoft DP, Holt KE, Moreau JW, 2016. Microbial mercury methylation in Antarctic sea ice. Nature Microbiology 1:16127. DOI:
Glud RN, Grossart H-P, Larsen M, Tang KW, Arendt KE, Rysgaard S, Thamdrup B, Gissel Nielsen T, 2015. Copepod carcasses as microbial hot spots for pelagic denitrification: Copepod carcasses and denitrification. Limnology and Oceanography 60:2026-2036. DOI:
Grossart H-P, Simon M, 1993. Limnetic macroscopic organic aggregates (lake snow): Occurrence, characteristics, and microbial dynamics in Lake Constance. Limnology and Oceanography 38:532-546. DOI:
Hammerschmidt CR, Fitzgerald WF, 2006. Methylmercury in Freshwater Fish Linked to Atmospheric Mercury Deposition. Environmental Science & Technology 40:7764-7770. DOI:
Hodson PV, Norris K, Berquist M, Campbell LM, Ridal JJ, 2014. Mercury concentrations in amphipods and fish of the Saint Lawrence River (Canada) are unrelated to concentrations of legacy mercury in sediments. Science of The Total Environment 494-495:218-228. DOI:
Kainz M, Mazumder A, 2005. Effect of Algal and Bacterial Diet on Methyl Mercury Concentrations in Zooplankton. Environmental Science & Technology 39:1666-1672. DOI:
Kim H, Soerensen AL, Hur J, Heimbürger L-E, Hahm D, Rhee TS, Noh S, Han S, 2017. Methylmercury Mass Budgets and Distribution Characteristics in the Western Pacific Ocean. Environmental Science & Technology 51:1186-1194. DOI:
King JK, Kostka JE, Frisher ME, Saunders FM, 2000. Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria Methylate Mercury at Variable Rates in Pure Culture and in Marine Sediments. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 66:2430-2437. DOI:
Kirk JL, St. Louis VL, Hintelmann H, Lehnherr I, Else B, Poissant L, 2008. Methylated Mercury Species in Marine Waters of the Canadian High and Sub Arctic. Environmental Science & Technology 42:8367-8373. DOI:
Lamborg CH, Hammerschmidt CR, Bowman KL, 2016. An examination of the role of particles in oceanic mercury cycling. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 374:20150297. DOI:
Lamborg CH, Yiğiterhan O, Fitzgerald WF, Balcom PH, Hammerschmidt CR, Murray J, 2008. Vertical distribution of mercury species at two sites in the Western Black Sea. Marine Chemistry 111:77-89. DOI:
Lehnherr I, St. Louis VL, Hintelmann H, Kirk JL, 2011. Methylation of inorganic mercury in polar marine waters. Nature Geoscience 4:298-302. DOI:
Lu X, Gu W, Zhao L, Haque MFU, Dispirito AA, Semrau JD, Gu B, 2017. Methylmercury uptake and degradation by methanotrophs. SCIENCE ADVANCES:6. DOI:
Lu X, Liu Y, Johs A, Zhao L, Wang T, Yang Z, Lin H, Elias DA, Pierce EM, Liang L, Barkay T, Gu B, 2016. Anaerobic Mercury Methylation and Demethylation by Geobacter bemidjiensis Bem. Environmental Science & Technology 50:4366-4373. DOI:
Malcolm EG, Schaefer JK, Ekstrom EB, Tuit CB, Jayakumar A, Park H, Ward BB, Morel FMM, 2010. Mercury methylation in oxygen deficient zones of the oceans: No evidence for the predominance of anaerobes. Marine Chemistry 122:11-19. DOI:
Mason RP, Fitzgerald WF, 1990. Alkylmercury species in the equatorial Pacific. Nature 347:457-459. DOI:
Mason RP, Fitzgerald WF, 1993. The distribution and biogeochemical cycling of mercury in the equatorial Pacific Ocean. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers 40:1897-1924. DOI:
Matilainen T, Verta M, 1995. Mercury methylation and demethylation in aerobic surface waters. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52:1597-1608. DOI:
Monperrus M, Tessier E, Amouroux D, Leynaert A, Huonnic P, Donard OFX, 2007a. Mercury methylation, demethylation and reduction rates in coastal and marine surface waters of the Mediterranean Sea. Marine Chemistry 107:49-63. DOI:
Monperrus M, Tessier E, Point D, Vidimova K, Amouroux D, Guyoneaud R, Leynaert A, Grall J, Chauvaud L, Thouzeau G, Donard OFX, 2007b. The biogeochemistry of mercury at the sediment–water interface in the Thau Lagoon. 2. Evaluation of mercury methylation potential in both surface sediment and the water column. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 72:485-496. DOI:
Munson KM, Lamborg CH, Boiteau RM, Saito MA, 2018. Dynamic mercury methylation and demethylation in oligotrophic marine water. Biogeosciences 15:6451-6460. DOI:
Nascimento AMA, Chartone-Souza E, 2003. Operon mer: Bacterial resistance to mercury and potential for bioremediation of contaminated environments. Genetics and Molecular Research:10.
Ortiz VL, Mason RP, Evan Ward J, 2015. An examination of the factors influencing mercury and methylmercury particulate distributions, methylation and demethylation rates in laboratory-generated marine snow. Marine Chemistry 177:753-762. DOI:
Pak K-R, Bartha R, 1998. Mercury Methylation and Demethylation in Anoxic Lake Sediments and by Strictly Anaerobic Bacteria. 64:1013-1017. DOI:
Paranjape AR, Hall BD, 2017. Recent advances in the study of mercury methylation in aquatic systems. FACETS 2:85-119. DOI:
Parks JM, Johs A, Podar M, Bridou R, Hurt RA, Smith SD, Tomanicek SJ, Qian Y, Brown SD, Brandt CC, Palumbo AV, Smith JC, Wall JD, Elias DA, Liang L, 2013. The Genetic Basis for Bacterial Mercury Methylation. Science 339:1332-1335. DOI:
Peterson BD, Mcdaniel EA, Schmidt AG, Lepak RF, Janssen SE, Tran PQ, Marick RA, Ogorek JM, Dewild JF, Krabbenhoft DP, Mcmahon KD, 2020. Mercury Methylation Genes Identified across Diverse Anaerobic Microbial Guilds in a Eutrophic Sulfate-Enriched Lake. Environmental Science & Technology 54:15840-15851. DOI:
Pickhardt PC, Fisher NS, 2007. Accumulation of Inorganic and Methylmercury by Freshwater Phytoplankton in Two Contrasting Water Bodies. Environmental Science & Technology 41:125-131. DOI:
Podar M, Gilmour CC, Brandt CC, Soren A, Brown SD, Crable BR, Palumbo AV, Somenahally AC, Elias DA, 2015. Global prevalence and distribution of genes and microorganisms involved in mercury methylation. Science Advances 1:e1500675-e1500675. DOI:
Poste AE, Skaar Hoel C, Andersen T, Arts MT, Færøvig P-J, Borgå K, 2019. Terrestrial organic matter increases zooplankton methylmercury accumulation in a brown-water boreal lake. Science of the Total Environment:10. DOI:
Qian C, Chen H, Johs A, Lu X, An J, Pierce EM, Parks JM, Elias DA, Hettich RL, Gu B, 2018. Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Biological Processes and Responses of the Bacterium Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132 upon Deletion of Its Mercury Methylation Genes. PROTEOMICS 18:1700479. DOI:
Regnell O, Watras CJ, 2019. Microbial Mercury Methylation in Aquatic Environments: A Critical Review of Published Field and Laboratory Studies. Environmental Science & Technology 53:4-19. DOI:
Rosati G, Heimbürger LE, Melaku Canu D, Lagane C, Laffont L, Rijkenberg MJA, Gerringa LJA, Solidoro C, Gencarelli CN, Hedgecock IM, De Baar HJW, Sonke JE, 2018. Mercury in the Black Sea: New Insights From Measurements and Numerical Modeling. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 32:529-550. DOI:
Schaefer JK, Rocks SS, Zheng W, Liang L, Gu B, Morel FMM, 2011. Active transport, substrate specificity, and methylation of Hg(II) in anaerobic bacteria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108:8714-8719. DOI:
Selin NE, 2014. Global change and mercury cycling: Challenges for implementing a global mercury treaty: Global change and mercury cycling. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 33:1202-1210. DOI:
Si Y, Zou Y, Liu X, Si X, Mao J, 2015. Mercury methylation coupled to iron reduction by dissimilatory iron-reducing bacteria. Chemosphere 122:206-212. DOI:
Simon M, Grossart H, Schweitzer B, Ploug H, 2002. Microbial ecology of organic aggregates in aquatic ecosystems. Aquatic Microbial Ecology 28:175-211. DOI:
Soerensen AL, Schartup AT, Skrobonja A, Bouchet S, Amouroux D, Liem-Nguyen V, Björn E, 2018. Deciphering the Role of Water Column Redoxclines on Methylmercury Cycling Using Speciation Modeling and Observations From the Baltic Sea. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 32:1498-1513. DOI:
Sunderland EM, Krabbenhoft DP, Moreau JW, Strode SA, Landing WM, 2009. Mercury sources, distribution, and bioavailability in the North Pacific Ocean: Insights from data and models: MERCURY IN THE NORTH PACIFIC OCEAN. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 23:n/a-n/a. DOI:
Sunderland EM, Selin NE, 2013. Future trends in environmental mercury concentrations: implications for prevention strategies. Environmental Health 12. DOI:
Topping G, Davies IM, 1981. Methylmercury production in the marine water column. Nature 290:243-244. DOI:
Ullrich SM, Tanton TW, Abdrashitova SA, 2001. Mercury in the Aquatic Environment: A Review of Factors Affecting Methylation. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 31:241-293. DOI:
Villar E, Cabrol L, Heimbürger-Boavida L-E. 2019. Widespread microbial mercury methylation genes in the global ocean. Genomics. DOI:
Wang F, Macdonald RW, Armstrong DA, Stern GA, 2012. Total and Methylated Mercury in the Beaufort Sea: The Role of Local and Recent Organic Remineralization. Environmental Science & Technology 46:11821-11828. DOI:
Wang F, Outridge PM, Feng X, Meng B, Heimbürger-Boavida L-E, Mason RP, 2019. How closely do mercury trends in fish and other aquatic wildlife track those in the atmosphere? – Implications for evaluating the effectiveness of the Minamata Convention. Science of The Total Environment 674:58-70. DOI:
Wang K, Munson KM, Beaupré-Laperrière A, Mucci A, Macdonald RW, Wang F, 2018. Subsurface seawater methylmercury maximum explains biotic mercury concentrations in the Canadian Arctic. Scientific Reports 8:14465. DOI:
Wang Z, Fei Z, Wu Q, Yin R, 2020. Evaluation of the effects of Hg/DOC ratios on the reduction of Hg(II) in lake water. Chemosphere 253:126634. DOI:
Wieland E, Lienemann P, Bollhalder S, Lück A, Santschi PH, 2001. Composition and transport of settling particles in Lake Zurich: relative importance of vertical and lateral pathways:. Aquatic Sciences 63:123-149. DOI:
Wu P, 2019. The importance of bioconcentration into the pelagic food web base for methylmercury biomagnification: A meta-analysis. Science of the Total Environment:11. DOI:
Wu P, Kainz M, Åkerblom S, Bravo AG, Sonesten L, Branfireun B, Deininger A, Bergström A-K, Bishop K, 2019. Terrestrial diet influences mercury bioaccumulation in zooplankton and macroinvertebrates in lakes with differing dissolved organic carbon concentrations. Science of The Total Environment 669:821-832. DOI:
Zhang L, Planas D, 1994. Biotic and abiotic mercury methylation and demethylation in sediments. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 52. DOI:
Zhang Y, Soerensen AL, Schartup AT, Sunderland EM, 2020. A global model for methylmercury formation and uptake at the base of marine food webs. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. DOI:
Zhou C, Cohen MD, Crimmins BA, Zhou H, Johnson TA, Hopke PK, Holsen TM, 2017. Mercury Temporal Trends in Top Predator Fish of the Laurentian Great Lakes from 2004 to 2015: Are Concentrations Still Decreasing? Environmental Science & Technology 51:7386-7394. DOI:

Edited by

Diego Fontaneto, CNR-IRSA, Verbania, Italy

How to Cite

Gallorini, Andrea, and Jean-Luc Loizeau. 2021. “Mercury Methylation in Oxic Aquatic Macro-Environments: A Review”. Journal of Limnology 80 (2).

List of Cited By :

Crossref logo