The past, the present and the future of eutardigrade taxonomy

Submitted: 20 March 2013
Accepted: 20 March 2013
Published: 27 March 2013
Abstract Views: 2435
PDF: 674
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.


The Author first recalls the past of eutardigrade taxonomy and indicates the main factors that for a long time restrained its progress. One consequence of a superficial analysis is that very wide individual variability has been erroneously attributed to many species, and this has become the main problem for tardigrade taxonomists. The situation began to change after 1969 because of the first attempts to eliminate the above mentioned problems. Novelties gave impetus to the revision of tardigrade taxonomy, and genuine systematics, finally based on phylogenetics, became popular. Today the morphological characters are considered more in depth and studies utilising DNA sequences are more in fashion; they are surely useful and allow the distinction of morphologically very similar species. However, in the author’s opinion, this progress will be possible only if the molecular studies are always associated with careful morphological studies, which, in the meantime, will be more and more detailed also thanks to the use of the Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM).



PlumX Metrics


Download data is not yet available.


Giovanni Pilato, University of Catania
Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences

How to Cite

Pilato, Giovanni. 2013. “The Past, the Present and the Future of Eutardigrade Taxonomy”. Journal of Limnology 72 (s1):e1.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

List of Cited By :

Crossref logo