Redescription and taxonomic validity of Leptodiaptomus cuauhtemoci (Osorio- Tafall, 1941) (Copepoda, Calanoida), with notes on its known distribution

Submitted: 10 December 2011
Accepted: 10 December 2011
Published: 1 February 2000
Abstract Views: 1543
PDF: 650
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Within the American freshwater calanoid copepods, Leptodiaptomus includes species whose taxonomical status is still unclear. One of them is L. cuauhtemoci (Osorio-Tafall), for decades considered to be a synonym of L. siciloides (Lilljeborg); another species involved in this problem is L. assiniboiensis (Anderson & Fabris) described from Canada, which had been found to be closely related to L. cuauhtemoci. This species remained of uncertain taxonomy because the type material was lost decades ago. In order to disentangle this controversy, type specimens of L. assiniboiensis, topotypic specimens of L. cuauhtemoci from a National Park in central Mexico, and confirmed specimens of L. siciloides from different locations in Mexico and the United States were used to define the status of these species. Leptodiaptomus cuauhtemoci was fully redescribed using SEM. Based on the main characters used to differentiate species of Diaptomidae, L. assiniboiensis (= Diaptomus intermedius Anderson & Fabris) turned out to be conspecific and a junior synonym of L. cuauhtemoci, which then becomes the valid name. The latter species shows taxonomically relevant differences with respect to L. siciloides. In the females the main differences is that the lateral spiniform processes on the genital somite are broader-based in L. cuauhtemoci, the genital field is different in both species. In L. cuauhtemoci the fifth leg endopods bear two large, broad, subterminal setae of about the same size, differently built than in L. siciloides. The male L. cuauhtemoci is slenderer, with wings of pediger 5 clearly more developed than those of L. siciloides. The armature of the modified right antennules and the structure of the fifth leg differ in both species. A large coxal spine is present on the right fifth leg of L. siciloides, whereas it is absent in L. cuauhtemoci. These differences were considered to be enough evidence for recognizing L. cuauhtemoci as a separate, valid species. Topotypic specimens of L. cuauhtemoci are designated as neotypes.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

SUÁREZ-MORALES, Eduardo, Marcelo SILVA-BRIANO, and Manuel ELÍAS-GUTIÉRREZ. 2000. “Redescription and Taxonomic Validity of Leptodiaptomus Cuauhtemoci (Osorio- Tafall, 1941) (Copepoda, Calanoida), With Notes on Its Known Distribution”. Journal of Limnology 59 (1):5-14. https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2000.5.

List of Cited By :

Crossref logo